Samsung's Galaxy Note 7 apology is appreciated, but transparency and details about what went wrong will go farther for the brand.
2016-11-09 08:37:49
alice
12
That transparency will do more to repair Samsung's brand hit than any apology will. Here's what questions I'd like answered:
How did the handoff between the players in the supply chain lead to the Galaxy Note 7 battery issue?
What processes will be changed?
How does Samsung's post mortem apply to the smartphone industry overall?
The actual cause of the battery issue and the role of hardware and software integration?
Where did Samsung controls and management decision making fall short and what's being done to fix those process shortfalls?
Add it up and the investigation into the device and its parts are important. The processes and learning for the rest of the industry will be just as important.
-
Warming to lithium-ion, Toyota charges up its battery options[2016/10/31]
-
Compounder Adell Plastics shifts work to other plants following Baltimore fire[2016/10/10]
-
New Power Report: October issue published[2016/10/27]
-
Vehicle sought in connection to Paige woman's murder[2016/11/05]
-
How safe are portable battery packs?[2016/10/21]
-
Should you fear your phone battery?[2016/10/13]
-
A window into battery life for next-gen lithium cells[2016/10/19]
-
St. Jude Warns Defibrillator Patients About Battery Risks[2016/10/12]
-
BLOG For want of a better battery: Bob McDonald[2016/10/15]
-
Japanese battery maker TDK reels from Samsung Note 7 debacle[2016/10/12]
-
Mopie Powerstation Review: A Smartphone's Secret To All-Day Battery Life[2016/09/26]
-
Microsoft remains silent as Surface Pro 3 battery woes pile up[2016/10/08]
-
iPhone 7 battery charging is so much slower than rivals (but at least it won’t explode)[2016/10/13]
-
How can a battery catch fire?[2016/10/15]